Comments on: John Welch on Book of Mormon Legal Cases

By: Mike Parker

Mike Parker — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:35:00 +0000

Welch is rad.

By: Kerry Shirts

Kerry Shirts — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:16:21 +0000

I think this book is one of the most significant ones on the Book of Mormon in at least the last decade! A signal contribution to the Book of Mormon research.

By: Terry Foraker

Terry Foraker — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:37:42 +0000

Interesting take on the rib/contend issue. It makes me think of the Savior’s rebuke of the Nephites for “contending” over the points of His doctrine–could it be that they were taking legal sanctions against each other over it, contrary to Alma 30:7?

By: Kent (MC)

Kent (MC) — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:15:22 +0000

Keller,

Thanks for linking to MormonConferences.org. I’m happy that it is a resource that is benefiting others.

By: Steve Smoot

Steve Smoot — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:29:27 +0000

Whoops. Typo. I meant to say, legible, not eligible.

My bad.

By: Steve Smoot

Steve Smoot — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:28:29 +0000

Thanks for the compliment, Bro. Keller. It was good to see you there too.

Truth be told, I am a terrible note taker. I usually take sloppy shorthand notes that takes me a long time to decipher afterwords. But once I do, I manage to create something eligible and understandable… hopefully…. :p

By: Keller

Keller — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:31:01 +0000

Thanks, Steve. Good to see you there. I like your notes because they do a better job capturing the Q and A flow of the presentation and you don’t cheat and use the book to help articulate the ideas like I did.

By: Steve Smoot

Steve Smoot — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:05:15 +0000

For all who are interested, I took notes of the lecture as well and have posted them on my blog:

http://www.americantestament.blogspot.com